More Pages: Chase Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43


Author's review
Smart first novel
Critiquing the Chase

Excellent story telling, but too unbelievableThis had the potential of a five star story but fell short in a few areas. The biggest one was his characters. While you learn to understand the motivations of the main character, Benjamin Chase, a war hero with a past that he is not particularly proud of, the rest of the characters just don't make any sense to me.
For instance, we have a homicide detective who has 1) the ring of the killer, which is a BIG clue that should lead right to the killer, and 2) somebody claiming to be in contact with the killer. He can't figure nor seems to do anything with the vital clue (#1). He also ignores Ben (#2). The detective believes Ben originally, but gives up on him too easily and on such false pretenses. I can almost understand taking the cop/guard but he could have left the phone tap behind so Ben could record the incoming calls. Was it being put to use elsewhere? I doubt it.
It seems like the murder victim had some lousy friends. His "lover" couldn't care less he had died or that she, too, had witness something utterly horrifying. She was shocked at first, but recovered quickly. A little too quickly. In fact, a lot too quickly. The best friend also doesn't care because, hey, we all die anyways. I don't know, I think most teenagers would have a little bit more reflection on their own immortality.
And then there is the shrink... WHERE TO BEGIN???? I'll leave it at that.
And I can't go over the victim's parents without giving too much of the story away, but there that doesn't add up either.
Ben also picks up a love interest during the course of this story. This story would be better without even mentioning her. It added to the story's disbelief.
The basic plot of the story started off good. There is a psychopath who wants to execute others for their sins. Okay, that is fairly believable. But then at the end you find out the true motivation of the killer. Oh, boy. Boy, oh boy, oh boy. I won't give it away, but he should have stuck with the original idea.
I will probably give the author another shot sometime in the future. As I stated, his writing ability is wonderful. Hopefully other stories are a little bit more thought out and more believable.
'Chase' is a good read, but short story is riveting!!On a negative note for 'Chase,' I felt Ben's love interest needed more character development; it's like she's just thrown in there suddenly. The book goes rather slow at times, and I found myself wondering if an abridged version might have been better. Also, this might just be a personal thing, but I had different expectations for what type of person the killer would be, so it was a strange ending and resolution at the end for me. But perhaps that adds to the mystique of the book, and you yourself might like that.
Now, as for the short story, "Down in the Darkness," I loved it so much that I listened to it twice so I, the second time around, could hear those subtley wound clues a virgin listen may have missed. The story from the very beginning grabs your attention and holds on tight until the end. Just what is the story behind the disappearing cellar in this new house? And what is down there? These are the questions you'll be urgently asking yourself as you explore the cellar with 'Jes.' The sights, smells and anxious but curious horror that Jes feels truly come to life. And the end will lead you on a path of self-introspection that makes you question your own motives and feelings at times. This short story is a concise work of art -- not too long, not too short -- your daily dose of Koontz at his best. Needless to say, I highly recommend it, and while I give 'Chase' a 4, I give this short story a 5++!
great book

Ahoy, matey, a worthy effort, but on the plank for ye nowFirst off, the story. Steve's a hollow young urban professional in some modern European city in which the residents speak English, visit pubs, drive nifty sports cars fast, and engage in shipping and receiving. Steve decides to chase a whim one night and finds himself rescuing a dimunitive fellow from the intent of three dark fiends. No fantasy involved however. The dimunitive fellow is just a short guy, and the fiends are simple muggers. Wrong. These people were using swords. Steve tries to shrug off the incident, although it is the most exciting thing that has happened to him in quite a long time. And he can't quite forget it, and finds himself again down by the shipyard. In no time, he finds himself involved completely, as he again saves the short guy's life, watches some kind of voodoo creature escape from a bail of hay, and then has his secretary abducted by the fiends (the "wolves").
It's not On Stranger Tides or A.A. Attanasio's Wyvern. There is a real sense of two different worlds colliding in Chase the Morning, rather than some alternate world (On Stranger Tides) or some new world that strangely resembles our own, but is consistent within itself (Wyvern). Chase the Morning is a fantasy novel in which someone from the real world finds fantastical things happening to them. This can be okay, except most readers are so familiar with the genre (which ranges from C.S. Lewis' "Narnia," to Stephen R. Donaldson's "Thomas Covenant"), that the new author should know what's been done. Rohan seems somewhat attune to the genre, but I think it's obvious that he missed the Donaldson books in particular, and that his work suffers from it. In fact, trying to compare Chase the Morning with Lord Foul's Bain better brings out the problems with Rohan's book than trying to compare it with Powers, in which the only things really shared there is an idea of a milieu. That's because Steve is supposed to be an anti-hero, like Donaldson's Thomas Covenant. It's tough to write a story in which your main protagonist is an anti-hero, because a reader's first inclination is to identify with the protagonist of the story, especially in a field like fantasy, where the hero is often a thinly veiled wish fulfillment character of the reader (see Orson Scott Card's widely successful "Ender" books for the clearest recent example of the same). Covenant works because he is an intensely unlikeable character; he is often so intensely unliked that readers can't make it through the first part of Lord Foul's Bain because they can't, and don't want to try to, understand Covenant. Donaldson overcomes the problem by allowing minor characters to become personifications of the reader: the mother of the girl he rapes in the third chapter (and who knows of his atrocity) takes Covenant to the lords not because of what he could mean to "the Land" but because she hopes that they will be able to punish him (which she is unable to do because of his "power") or because she hopes that something good can become of his evil deed (that the lords can use him to save the Land). This is complex stuff for a fantasy novel.
Rohan's Steve, on the other hand, is a likable character. Oh, sure, he's described as hollow, but I think most readers wouldn't necessarily find that a damning description. Steve's unlikable traits are always described (told) to the reader; when the action gets going, Steve's always doing the heroic thing (shown). The reader translates this as Steve's the hero, so when the plot rolls around to using the fact that Steve's a dweeb who is worthless as a human, the reader's inclination is to say, "What?" So Chase the Morning is a flawed book. Rohan is someone with potential, though, because he realized that without the anti-hero idea, his novel was just another rehash of the same ol' dropping the modern character in the fantasy world. That is, Rohan is at least trying to go beyond formula, and while he fails, one should applaud the effort.
Great Concepts and Orginality!
A transport of delight

Art and Time in Italy
Greats Work of Short Fiction
With all his "shtick," one of our greatest writersDespite my recent and more mature awareness of his weaknesses, he remains a surprising, brilliant writer. His prose style is dynamic and I continue to emulate that. I was amused to find, however, that I liked the lesser known stories. I found "Death In Venice" ponderous. I liked the stories about the incestuous twins, the tragic man who was dwarfed from a childhood fall, the cuckolded buffoon who is talked into wearing a tutu at a community recital and the eccentric who is compelled to continually mutiliate his dog and heal him. Now these are what I would call real "case histories." I'm sure Mann would scorn me for being partial to these, scornfulness being one of his main attitudes in life. His very disdain of pretension, however, seems like a pretension in itself. Still - his command of language is like no other's.


Getting High?Being a big fan of the film version of The Paper Chase I was kind of expecting a 1940's book that would flesh out the character of Ford and add some depth to the story but what arrived from Amazon was copyright 1978 and had references to mini skirts, getting high, and a quote about Vietnam War protests.
I enjoyed reading it but it was not nearly as good as the movie. It didn't much new plot developments; maybe 15% of the book consists of new things that are not in the film version of The Paper Chase. For example Hart and Ford are at a diner when a guy runs in, snatches a hamburger from the plate of the people next to them at the counter, runs outside and stands there banging on the window and giving them "the finger". Hart, curious, goes out to talk to the fellow and ends up in a fistfight. One benefit was you could be inside Hart's head and know what he was thinking. Susan is much colder to Hart in the book too.
The movie was a masterpiece. The book (at least the 1978 edition that arrived at my house) will only satisfy true fans of the film, desperate, perhaps, to wring a few more drops out of this great story in the manner that a fan of Star Wars might read "A Splinter In the Mind's Eye" (featuring Luke Skywalker as a character).
I know my hometown library lists, in their online catalog, a 1940 edition of the Paper Chase so surely there's an older version floating around. The one I got from Amazon, with it's references to the 1960's, seems like a modern rewrite of the novel, made expressly for fans of the movie.
A must read book for one L law school student
A Paper Chase Review

Review by a Mother of an Eight Year Old
Helpful, but could have been better.
Your eight year old review

Solid and well-crafted 2nd book from Loretta ChaseThe plot is not largely set in Albania, despite what the blurbs and the reviews say. If you do not like exotic locales, avoid this book, even though the Albanian scenes are relatively small.
This book, like the other early books by Chase, is a traditional Regency, which means no explicit sex (by and large) and the hero and the heroine behaving within the documented constraints of the Regency society. [I am beginning to different traditional Regencies from Regency historicals, by whether the hero and heroine adhere to social norms and customs or whether they act on the extremes of said customs and whether they behave and think like Regency people or 20th century people. Length alone is no longer a good judge, nor is explicit lovemaking]. If you love the Regency historicals by Chase, some of which are very very good, you will find this book and others like it more disappointing.
I was delighted by this book, which is hard to find and out of print (I obtained my copy via inter-branch loan at my public library). I also deeply regret that Walker and Avon no longer publish traditional Regencies, since both companies published some of the best works by Chase and Jo Beverley (and some others no longer writing Regency romances).
Now to the plot - Basil Trevelyan, the villain of ISABELLA, has redeemed himself by hard work and some service of a mysterious kind (perhaps spying) to the Crown. He has also managed to make his own fortune with the help of Isabella's aunt. Basil is in Greece when a letter from his aunt asks him to help out a young Englishwoman travelling in Albania with her father and fiance, both archaelogists and historians.
Alexandra has a problem or rather several problems. She is not interested in marrying her fiance, who has been foisted on her to repay her father's debt to said fiance's father. Furthermore, her fiance is completely uninterested in her as a woman. This would be bad enough; things turn worse when his indifference to his fiancee is interpreted by love-struck Albanian males as encouragement to court Alexandra. One such young Albanian in fact carries off Alexandra, intending to make her his wife. This, not unnaturally, upsets his family for several reasons, one being that Alexandra is known as the "English Witch" for her unearthly beauty.
Alexandra is rescued by Basil, who is pretending to be her secret fiance who has been out in the world making his fortune. Using this story, Alexandra persuades her father to delay her forthcoming marriage. When she returns to England, she has few doubts about her continuing problems. First, there is her unworldly and exasperating father's debts. His creditor will not accept repayment of those debts, preferring a marriage to Alexandra (which is to raise his family socially). Secondly, there is the problem that Alexandra's beauty does not mean that she will win honorable offers. In fact, the beautiful Alexandra Ashmore (?) has been plagued in the past by the most dishonourable proposals possible - which was why her father took her off to Albania and arranged her marriage to suit himself.
Basil, naturally, is not immune to the English Witch. Fortunately for Alexandra, the heir to a dukedom catches sight of her and is determined to make her his bride. Definitely honorable. There are of course some minor problems. Firstly, Basil continues his attentions to Alexandra, although more subtly (partly in an old rivalry with Lord Arden, the new suitor; partly because he is really interested in Alexandra). Secondly, Alexandra's father's debt has grown mysteriously, and she is not sure as to whether she can get out of her engagement (her real one, not her pretend one to Basil). Thirdly, the Marquess of Arden is not the most faithful suitor, tending to be distracted by pretty neighbors and the like. And of course, he has his own idealized view of her, which will not distract him from future womanizing. Basil has a dreadful reputation as well, and in fact, had left England in disgrace.
So Alexandra hardly has great choices. She cannot jilt her fiance, because of her father's debt. She feels she should not marry Arden, because he will be an inconsistent husband and one who intends to keep her on a pedestal. And Basil is out of the question, of course.
Who will Alexandra marry? There is a thwarted elopement (which had me in stitches), there is the sister of Lord Arden who feels (perhaps rightly) that he *must* marry Alexandra, if only because he is throwing away his last chance of redemption otherwise. There is Basil's own strange behavior. There is Alexandra's father who is strongly opposed to any match with Basil. There is of course the Debt. And there are all those relations of Isabella who have a bone to pick with Basil (from his behavior in the previous book).
This was a delightful novel. I was rooting at different times for different men, and wondering how Alexandra would find a satisfactory compromise between the needs of her father, social constraints, and her own wish for a stable and successful marriage. At one time, I thought that she had made the wrong choice - but hoped that her husband would turn out satisfactorily. ...I would strongly recommend this book to any lover of Regency romance - and commend it along with KNAVES WAGER (my favorite Chase book) as worthy of inclusion on the all-time best list. If you can, read ISABELLA before this, to understand precisely why Basil was so abhorrent to Alexandra's father and some of his own relations. However, this novel can stand on its own.
Wonderful book
Fabulous

For Classic Noir Fans Only?
The Crime Master's Classic
Argh!

A HUGE disappointmentKasey Michaels was new to me. This will be the last of her books/stories, however, as it was rather one-dimensional peopled with over-drawn and unsympathetic characters in a plot that defied belief. Just for starters, it was never and is not now legal to get married in England on the spur of the moment, without banns or license and in an inn! What was the author thinking of here? Sadly, this effort was juvenile, unpolished and stretched credibility too far for me.
Lyn Stone is also new to me and, again, I won't be seeking out anything further from her either. Her contribution was boring, stilted, contained credulous dialogue and action and the characters had nothing to cause me to give them a second thought. I struggled to finish it.
Gayle Wilson has a certain speciality which her fans will recognise and most probably relish. She creates flawed, imperfect heros who, despite this, are strong alpha men who don't let a disability stand in their way; instead it becomes a positive attraction to them! However, this time in her contribution, she has created a hero who milks his flaw (scarred face) far beyond anything acceptable and thus his actions are really unbelievably silly. If he is meant to be strong and heroic, he certainly does not behave that way. Wilson's "My Darling Echo" contribution to the anthology "Bride by Arrangement" was so superior to this effort that it makes this one quite insipid. Sorry to be so negative about a writer I always enjoy but in all honesty, I don't understand why she allowed this one to get published. It was not at all up to her usual standards.
So, we have a good author's dubious effort here, sandwiched between two totally forgettable stories. The end result - a sandwich not worth tasting. I'm hugely disappointed!
Another Wonderful Hero by Gayle Wilson!
True Gayle Wilson fans WON'T be disappointed!!

An Overwrought Melodrama
Smart, sexy romanceGreat setting, richly realized, also. If you like literate, well-crafted romance with plenty of action and strong emotion, I can absolutely recommend Heart of Night.
Rare treat
Cartright to rise to the top of a small, respected machine
tool company located in the industrial mid-west. Obsessed
by his need to succeed, he becomes completely unhinged both
morally and ethically as he schemes and plots to get ahead.
His wife, his friends, his employers are all cut down by his
single-minded struggle. Eventually he reaches his goal.
But soon afterwards he finds himself on the garbage heap of
failure, a fitting reward for running over everybody in his
way. Slowly he realizes the enormity of the carnage that he
created and the absurdity of unbridled ambition. At the
novel's end he has taken a few hesitant steps towards
building a new life from the rubble of the old.